Clear ideas. Concrete application.
For teams, communities and groups that want to make tasks visible and agree on distributions, supports and substitutions. The course allows mapping times, interruptions, boundaries and care in fictitious or cases, and translating the analysis into a clear, realistic and reviewable agreement without requiring intimate data or applying the outcome to private life.
For whom
Adults from teams, communities, families, associations and networks. It can be contracted by a company, administration, educational center or other entity for its groups.
What you will learn
- Identify physical, emotional and organizational tasks, including those that usually remain invisible.
- Represent tasks, times, availability, interruptions, breaks and supports in a chosen case or context without using intimate data.
- Propose distributions with responsible parties, rotation, substitutions and limits of availability.
- Draft a agreement with a renegotiation channel and a review date.
The syllabus, no mystery.
Each module combines concepts, a practice and a question to build your own criterion.
- Physical, emotional and organizational tasks
- Visible and invisible work: doing, reminding, coordinating and following up
- Inventory of a fictitious day
- Diverse roles without inferring responsibilities based on gender, age or cohabitation
In groups, complete the inventory of a fictitious day and classify each task by type, frequency and need for follow-up.
A question to ponderWhat tasks tend to disappear when we only count what is done with the hands?
Your result: Classified inventory that includes direct tasks, anticipation, coordination and follow-up, with a brief justification.
Your final project.
Individual or group agreement based on a fictitious case: brief map of tasks and times, distribution, rotation or substitutions, supports, limits of availability, renegotiation channel and review date. It is completed within 12 hours and, in group work, includes a traceable individual contribution.
This is how we work.
How we review what has been learned
Formative assessment through initial and final self-assessment, a checklist, and peer review. It is observed whether the analysis makes tasks visible, considers supports and limits, avoids , and converts the diagnosis into a clear, reviewable agreement. Personal experience and ideological affinity are not scored.
Format and sessions
Four 3-hour sessions, in-person, live virtual or . Practice and assessment included; there are no mandatory tasks outside.
Before starting
No prior knowledge is required. Work is done with fictitious or cases and each person can participate orally, in writing, or as an observer.
Proposed instructor profile
Proposed instructor profile: facilitation with relevant professional experience in care, or socio-educational intervention. Roles, profile and availability will be verified before each edition.
Scope of the course
It is not therapy, diagnosis, clinical mediation, or legal advice. It does not require revealing experiences, family or intimate data, nor applying the agreement in private life. It recognizes gender inequalities and diversity without asking for partisan adherence.
Reference sources
The cited entities are sources for consultation, not collaborators or endorsers of CRUSH.