Clear ideas. Concrete application.
For managers and who review meetings, priorities, autonomy and supports. The course analyzes organizational factors of strain through cases, differentiates matters that require prevention or responsible channels and builds a plan with three measures and a scheduled participatory review, rehearsed with peers.
For whom
Middle managers and human resources officers of public, private or social organizations who coordinate teams or participate in decisions about workloads, times, meetings and supports.
What you will learn
- Identify organizational sources of wear or burnout without attributing them to an alleged lack of individual .
- Analyze how burdens, time, roles, meetings, autonomy and supports distribute boundaries and opportunities.
- Distinguish organizational problems from matters that require activating prevention, labor representation or other responsible channels.
- Design three viable measures with a person responsible, deadline, indicator and planned participatory review.
The syllabus, no mystery.
Each module combines concepts, a practice and a question to build your own criterion.
- Workload, rhythms and availability
- Autonomy, roles, supports and limits
- Individual burnout and organizational conditions
- Safe participation to observe problems
Analyze a fictitious team case and separate signs of burnout, organizational decisions and factors that cannot be solved with individual advice.
A question to ponderWhat part of the strain does an organization normally attribute to individuals, and what would change if it examined their working conditions?
Your result: Case map with four organizational factors, two possible effects and a checking question for the team.
Your final project.
Individual or group improvement plan for a fictitious or organizational situation: three justified measures, each with a person responsible, deadline, resources, indicator, and planned participatory review date. It is presented, subjected to questions and rehearsed with peers within the 16 hours; it does not attribute real participation to a team not present. In groups, individual contribution is recorded.
This is how we work.
How we review what has been learned
Integrated formative assessment: case analysis, observed practices, peer review, and for the final plan. The assessment values identifying organizational factors, justifying priorities, specifying measures, and recognizing limits of action. Personal experience disclosure is not evaluated.
Format and sessions
Five teaching blocks that correspond to the modules (3 + 4 + 3 + 3 + 3 hours), in-person, live virtual or ; they can be scheduled in equivalent full days without fragmenting the pedagogical sequence. Practice and assessment within the 16 hours; breaks excluded.
Before starting
No prior knowledge is required. It is useful to have firsthand knowledge of team coordination or work organization; fictitious or cases will be used.
Proposed instructor profile
Proposed instructor profile: a team with relevant professional experience in work organization, facilitation or socio-educational intervention. Facilitators, roles and credentials will be specified and verified before each edition.
Scope of the course
This is not therapy, a diagnosis of professional burnout, or a risk assessment. It does not replace prevention services, labor representation, applicable protocols, or specialized supports. Intimate data or personal accounts are not requested.
Reference sources
The cited entities are sources for consultation, not collaborators or endorsers of CRUSH.